This Saturday started off like
any other day. My alarm clock dutifully rang at 9am, half awake I stumbled out
of bed grabbing the newspaper, waiting on my coffee. As I opened the front page
and scanned through the staggering manner in which my country was depicted in
the headlines my eyes were drawn to an ad for a shirt. But dear reader, do not
be fooled, this was no ordinary shirt.
So here I am sitting in the capital
of a conservative country and even before I have had a sip of my morning coffee
what am I confronted with on the front page? A semi-naked woman exposed with
her breast to the reader, hands held suggestively between her legs and an
exasperated look on her face. Forgive me, but is an invitation for coitus
(apologize for this graphic description, but it’s the truth) the best way to
sell a shirt? Undoubtedly, the ad men succeeded in their task by grabbing my
attention. Now the obvious question
remains, is SEX the only tool of persuasion available to draw interest to a
product's merits? Such an approach may be successful with many young men
between the ages of 18-35 (their target demographic) but what is the impact of
such an advertising campaign on other readers? Ad men continue to use
sexual imagery in advertising as a means of persuading the reader to a
product's virtues. Marketers continue to use more sex in advertising for a
greater range of products. The range of merchandise
that are traditionally associated with sex appeals are usually designer
clothing, alcohol and fragrances which appear to be featuring sexual imagery
that is increasingly explicit.
So I'm obviously concerned at
what thoughts run through a 13-year old boy's mind when affronted with such
graphic ads let alone the reactive thoughts of a 50-year old woman. Leaving
those questions open as I triage through my daily dose of so-called 'news',
what becomes clear is that the production of our newspapers has become highly
dependent on funding generated by advertisements of a sexual nature. Of course
one could have a fertile discussion about whether this is good or bad for the
future of journalism but my question remains: Is it NEWS? And should it have
any place in our newspapers?
Marshall Mcluhan once said “All
media exist to invest our lives with artificial perceptions and arbitrary
values". How true. In a country where conversations operate under the
maxim 'Though Shalt Not Discuss Sex in Public' (your guess is as good as any,
looking our rising population it surely is not increasing because of any other
reason) how can it be deemed acceptable to have semi-naked women on the front
page of national daily newspaper? In addition, as a reader I feel genuinely
cheated as my newspaper was purchased in order to read the read the latest news
and keep myself well-informed. Instead, I am given page after page of sexually
explicit advertising. I am a grown man, such things can be purchased
alternatively through Playboy.
I discussed my concerns with , a
marketing expert ( who wants to remain anonymous as he represents on of the
biggest marketing companies on the globe ) who explained that "Sex is a
taboo theme in India, the more one uses it the more people would like to sneak
a peek, more interest in the product/brand. The more shocking it is, people
will talk about it more, be interested and share it. That is exactly what makes
an ad campaign successful." So what happens to our society? Every day from
the time we wake up till we go to bed, we are bombarded with advertisements on
a variety of different platforms be it newspapers, TV, radio, street hoardings
with ads which are sexual in nature. But our social systems are still very
closed to these topics with the vast majority of us never having seen our
parents kiss and most of us hesitating to demonstrate even the slightest bit of
PDA in front of them.
The media conveys camouflaged
messages about what is appropriate in society. This message when examined
through the lens of gender suggests men to be proactive, aggressive as compared
to women (who are objectified as sexual toys for men). The constant reminder of
this ‘Barbie Doll' , ‘He – Man' divide with photoshoped images cannot merely be
classified as an innocent pastime as it leads to the cultivation of unrealistic
aspirations. (For further proof do watch Killing Us Softly ).
The media no longer finds itself
on the periphery of society, today it finds itself in the midst of its own cultural
revolution. A constant in our lives, and hence having a major effect on how we
act and react to daily life situations. Female sexuality is used to sell
products (as men usually control the wealth), be it through music videos,
advertisements, songs, movies or newspapers. The constant promotion of men as
sexual aggressors on women, as sex objects, leads to the normalization and acceptance
of violence as a common practice. And in reality it's not! (For further proof
do watch Dreamworlds )
Now begs the obvious question, is
this contradiction the reason for so many sex crimes? Does the constant
presence of sexual content in our day to day life lead to the creation of an
augmented reality?
Critics will say, but people are
smart, they can choose! I agree, that they can. On the one hand we have the
best psychologists advising advertising firms on how best to maximize their
exposure (and ad revenue) to their key market demographics for their products. On
the other hand, individuals are unaware of these tactics, believing what they
see on television, hear on the radio and read in the newspaper. And sadly once
these readers become consumers, use a product and come to the realization that
it has in fact not changed their lives as promised (tragically AXE deodorant
will not make girls jump into bed with you: tried and tested) they will cease
using it. But what is the collateral damage of this process? Is it acceptable
that people get hurt in the process of selling perfume?
The owners of these big advertising
firms (mostly men let's be honest) only care about the potential generated
revenue stream of a product rather than any potential effects of the violent
sexual nature of their ad campaigns. As a result of losing money by executing
alternative ad campaigns that have failed they have returned to the repetitive
ad campaigns we know all too well where 'sex is best'.
Let me end of a final note. Dear
Advertiser, you want to sell me a pink Oxford shirt with buttons? Try appealing
to me through issues other than sex which interest me such as science, sports,
social welfare or society. I am an evolved man who can handle being appealed to
on a variety of different platforms rather than just sex. Use your creativity,
there are other aspects of life which are as important as sex. Tell me about
the thread count used in making my desired pink shirt, the man who made it, which
social events I can wear it to (cricket perhaps?) or how many employees this
company employs in India. There you go, I've done your job. If I can come up
with 4 ideas in 4 minutes I am sure the geniuses working in your offices can do
a lot more. I look forward to seeing what you come up with.
well written
ReplyDeleteGood job sirji...However, as the wife of an 'ad man' I know for a fact that most admen would kill to get a chance to sell things other than skin and sex. This objectification and consequent disrespect of women follows from a deep-seated knowledge in the minds of the big fish that having Katrina eat a mundane fruit seductively is most likely to grab eyeballs and increase recall value of their products. Believe me, it does nothing for most men i know that an actress is stripping for a calender or posing for a cement company!!
ReplyDeleteThe scary bit, as you have pointed out, is how this ruthless tease in the glamour industry is affecting the lives, agency and volition of other women...
its the case of what came first; the chicken or the egg. Have audiences become more prone to accepting products which are advertised with a sexual tone, or have advertisers just assumed that that is the only way to grab attention?
ReplyDeleteThe objectification is really sad, and what is sadder is that big names, who can put their foot down, are also succumbing to this.
Great post!
Your choice of words for the title perform the same functions that the 'big fish' intend for their brands.
ReplyDelete